The EU-Mercosur trade deal was believed to be heading toward the finish. The election of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva as the president of Brazil, as successor to the right-wing populist Jair Bolsonaro, and the Spanish presidency of the European Union (EU), raised hopes for its conclusion. But the reservations expressed by several EU member states and some Latin American countries have dashed hopes.
Lula wants to conclude the agreement before the end of Brazil’s Mercosur presidency. Supporters believe that this window of opportunity should be taken advantage of. But the EU’s insistence on compliance with environmental standards as a condition for concluding the agreement has met with little enthusiasm in the Latin American partner states. This raises the question of whether the EU-Mercosur trade agreement negotiated in 2019 still meets the parties’ expectations. Faced with a fragmented international community, exacerbated by the war in Ukraine, and growing Sino-American rivalry, the EU is looking for new trading partners with whom it shares the same values.
These agreements also echo the EU’s economic security strategy presented by Ursula von der Leyen in June 2023, which emphasizes security of supply and diversification. In addition to strengthening its supply chains and reducing its dependence on the critical raw materials needed for the EU’s green transition, the EU hopes to further political cohesion with Latin America through the EU-Mercosur agreements. But there is disagreement in the EU about the EU-Mercosur trade deal: Some member states fear disadvantages for domestic agriculture. But the Mercosur countries are also increasingly demanding and threaten to turn toward China which promises to increase investment and develop trade relations with the region.
About the Authors
Marie Krpata is a Fellow Researcher at the Study Committee on Franco-German Relations (Cerfa) at the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri).
Ana Helena Palermo is a consultant to the President of the ZEW – Leibniz-Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung.