Opinion & Analysis

Serbia’s cooperation with China, the European Union, Russia and the United States of America

Executive Summary

Historically, Serbia has been fluid in its geopolitical alliances, feeling no need to stay wedded to partners if they were no longer useful for the realization of its regional strategy.

With Serbia moving towards EU accession, it appears that the Balkan nation has gone against its past and several centuries’ worth of diplomacy to cast its lot in definitively with Europe. However, even with the EU accession process, domestic politics, cultural affinities, and regional interests are once again driving Serbia’s foreign policy and Serbia appears to be courting other suitors. Russia and relative newcomers the United States and (especially) China have all expressed an interest in the country independent of the EU, and it is unknown how Serbia’s recent moves will comport with its desire for EU membership. Is Serbia falling back on old ways? Will it ever be able to fully commit to the EU?

This study examines Serbia’s foreign policy vis a vis these four powers (the EU, the United States, Russia, and China) and quantifies and qualifies the actual extent of its relationship with each partner across four key metrics: foreign aid, trade, foreign direct investment, and security and defence. A key result which emerges is that each power has its own interests in Serbia, which, for the most part, are mutually exclusive of other powers:

  • Our analysis shows that the EU has been predominantly focused on trade and human rights issues as a part of the ongoing accession process, with trade increasing impressively since the signing of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement (SAA). The EU is also the single largest investor in the Serbian economy, accounting for approximately 80 % of all FDI in the country in 2016;
  • The United States, on the other hand, has a larger national security interest in the country due to its location on migration routes from the Middle East and Central Asia, and has been focused on combatting terrorism and trafficking;
  • Energy politics and the use of Serbia as a foreign policy tool against the West appears to be the focus of Russia in the country, with trade and investment being of lesser priority; and
  • China’s main interest in Serbia appears to be infrastructure investment and creating a hub in the Balkans for Chinese goods, as part of the broader ‘One Belt One Road’ initiative globally.

Serbia’s balancing act is likely to continue for the short-term, but eventually Serbia will have to align its policies with the EU if it is to become a full-fledged member. To help Serbia further along this path, we suggest a number of recommendations for the EU and the European Parliament in particular going forward in dealing with these issues.

Read the full report here