Industrial Cooperation Is Key to Value Creation and Long-Term Collaboration
Diversifying the supply of mineral resources is a strategic necessity – one in which resource-rich countries of the Global South play a crucial role. Zambia, which is a major global copper exporter and possesses other critical raw materials, is seeking long-term alliances that will mobilise investment and promote local value creation. The EU has taken the first step towards cooperation with the strategic raw material partnership. But if it is to remain competitive in the geopolitical arena, a stronger industrial policy foundation will be needed. That includes a coherent raw material foreign policy aligned with the “Team Europe” approach and targeted financial instruments to support industrial cooperation.
Amid rising demand for minerals and increasing geopolitical tensions, both the EU and governments around the world are actively seeking partnerships with resource-rich countries of the Global South. Zambia, which belongs to the Southern African Development Community (SADC), is currently at the centre of international raw material diplomacy. This is because of its reserves and production of copper, which is indispensable for energy and transportation infrastructure as well as electronics. Moreover, the country also has important deposits of battery raw materials such as cobalt, nickel and manganese.
Under President Hakainde Hichilema, the government is seeking to capitalise on international interest to rapidly expand Zambia’s raw material sector. China and the Gulf states are acting swiftly: the former is increasing its presence in Zambia’s mining sector, while the latter are positioning themselves as new partners. The EU, too, is seeking closer cooperation: in 2023, it signed a strategic raw material partnership with Zambia. Time is of the essence right now: if the EU wants to succeed in the global competition for raw materials, it must intensify its cooperation with Zambia, particularly in the industrial sector. This is not only the main priority for the Zambian government; it is also of strategic significance for Europe’s industrial resilience.
Strategic partnerships – including that with Zambia – need to be more firmly anchored in the overall concept of the EU’s raw material strategy. It is only in this way that the expansion of EU capacities and partnership-based cooperation in supply chains can be linked. At the same time, the EU would be offering an alternative to the protectionist policies of the United States under President Donald Trump. Indeed, the new course being followed by the US is forcing Europe to become more independent and to more decisively pursue the “Team Europe” approach.
Ambitions and challenges of the EU’s raw material partnerships
The EU’s raw material policy has significantly gained in importance in recent years. With the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) of April 2024, the EU aims to reduce dependencies and diversify its supplies – especially of the 17 raw materials identified as strategic. While the expansion of European capacities is under way, the implementation of international partnerships remains crucial if supply chains are to become more resilient.
So far, the EU has forged 14 raw material partnerships. In October 2023, it signed a legally non-binding memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Zambia as well as a similar agreement with the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). The EU thereby signalled to mineral-rich countries of the Global South that it wants to be a reliable and long-term partner in the raw material sector. Besides securing its own supplies, the EU is seeking to promote “win-win” cooperation that will contribute to value creation in partner countries.
The partnerships are to be implemented through the “Team Europe” approach, which involves coordinated cooperation between the EU, its member states and their financial institutions. The MoU with Zambia is now being put into practice. As part of the institutional process, the two sides have drawn up a joint implementation roadmap. The EU delegation to Zambia is now tasked with overseeing its execution on behalf of the Union, including the coordination of Member State contributions. The roadmap outlines measures in five areas:
-
Integration of supply chains (joint ventures, industrial cooperation)
-
Infrastructure financing
-
Research and innovation
-
Capacity building
-
Sustainable and responsible sourcing
The roadmap was finalised in June 2024 but, like all such roadmaps, will not be made public. One year after the signing of the MoU, the foundation for cooperation has been laid. However, Zambia’s expectations – particularly in the area of supply chain integration – have not been met. The EU must act more quickly in order to establish itself as a credible partner in what is an increasingly competitive environment. After all, Zambia is a sought-after raw material partner. Public records indicate that at least eight bilateral declarations of intent have been concluded by the government in the last two years. With his foreign policy stance of “positive neutrality”, President Hichilema, is pursuing a broad diversification strategy. Whether and to what extent these partnerships will pay off for Zambia remains to be seen. Recently, there have been two important developments.
First, neither the EU nor Zambia can regard the US as a reliable partner under the current administration in Washington. For Brussels, this is a strategic setback, as it had been counting on transatlantic cooperation, particularly within Mineral Security Partnership (MSP) initiated by the US in 2022. The goal of the MSP is to diversify raw material supply chains and reduce dependence on China through cooperation with allies. However, the results have been disappointing to date: only one copper exploration project in Zambia has been granted MSP status and there have been no further investments in the country. Under the “America First” policy, it is likely that the US will discontinue or at least scale back its engagement in the MSP; and the same applies to the joint financing of infrastructure in the region with the EU.
Second, China and the Gulf states are acting more swiftly and responding more directly to Zambia’s call for investment in its raw material sector. At the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) 2024, Beijing pledged new multi-billion-dollar infrastructure investments. At the same time, China remains the largest buyer of Zambian copper while Chinese companies have announced investments totalling US$5 billion. For their part, the Gulf states are positioning themselves strategically. The United Arab Emirates has secured a key source of copper through the acquisition of the Mopani Copper Mines by International Resources Holdings. And Saudi Arabia is stepping up its raw material diplomacy: in January 2025, it signed an MoU with Zambia. Its mining investment arm, Manara Minerals, is planning to take stakes in Zambian mines and exploration projects.
Zambia’s ambitions: Mining to become growth engine
The Zambian government welcomes the growing geopolitical interest in its raw materials. Since taking office in 2021, President Hichilema has been seeking to stabilise the economy; but despite a successful debt restructuring, the country’s finances remain strained. The mining sector is expected to become Zambia’s growth engine. Indeed, it already forms the backbone of the domestic economy: in 2022, it accounted for 72 per cent of exports and 44 per cent of government revenues.
The main focus is copper production, which is already well established (see figure below). According to the government’s plan, which is being driven forward by the Ministry of Mines and Mineral Development, copper output is to increase from just over 820,000 tons in 2024 to 3 million tons by 2031; however, industry experts consider 1.5 million tons to be more realistic. At the same time, the extraction of critical raw materials is to be diversified in order to profit from global demand – especially in sectors such as the energy transition and battery production. The country’s first national Critical Minerals Strategy (CRM), presented in autumn 2024, is intended to make better use of what is the largely untapped potential of resources such as manganese, nickel and lithium. However, this will require substantial investments in exploration and the development of new mines.
To attract investors, the Hichilema government is promoting investment security and political stability. Both featured prominently at the “Insaka: Invest in Zambian Mining” conference, which took place for the first time in October 2024. Alongside Zambia’s reform plans, a new exploration programme was presented, to be carried out by Spanish firm Xcalibur and financed with US$98 million from the national budget.
To support the planned expansion of the mining sector, Zambia must also invest in infrastructure, particularly in the energy sector. More than 80 per cent of the country’s electricity comes from hydropower, which means the energy supply is vulnerable to droughts. In fact, this is currently the case, with mining and copper processing significantly affected. Nonetheless, primary processing of ore continues to take place inside the country: in 2023, besides approximately 737,000 tons of copper, Zambia produced 637,000 tons of anodes (impure copper) and 199,000 tons of cathodes (high-purity copper). While energy supply is now being stabilised through imports, coal and solar energy are expected to ensure increased stability in the future.
Furthermore, Transport infrastructure is becoming another strategic focus. Zambia has secured support for two major railway projects: the modernisation of the TAZARA railway line to Tanzania (with backing from China) and the Zambian link to the Lobito Corridor, which is planned to enhance connectivity to Angola and the DRC (US and EU).
Reform plans and state control
To achieve its expansion plans in the raw materials sector, Zambia depends on private capital. At the same time, the government is attempting a balancing act: it is striving for greater state control over the resource sector in order to benefit from the expected “commodity boom”, secure revenues for the state coffers and boost local value creation; but it wants to achieve those goals without scaring off the private sector.
About the author: